UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): September 26, 2017
Western Digital Corporation
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
| Delaware | 001-08703 | 33-0956711 | ||
| (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation) |
(Commission File Number) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| 5601 Great Oaks Parkway San Jose, California |
95119 | |
| (Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code) |
(408) 717-6000
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Not applicable
(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):
| ☐ | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
| ☐ | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
| ☐ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
| ☐ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (17 CFR §230.405) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR §240.12b-2).
Emerging growth company ☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure.
On September 26, 2017, Western Digital Corporation provided further detail on the legal process related to the three NAND flash-memory joint ventures operated with Toshiba Corporation. The press release making this statement is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference.
In accordance with General Instruction B.2 of Form 8-K, the information in this Item 7.01, including Exhibit 99.1, shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
| (d) | Exhibits |
2
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| Western Digital Corporation | ||||||||
| (Registrant) | ||||||||
| By: | /s/ Michael C. Ray | |||||||
| Date: September 26, 2017 | Michael C. Ray | |||||||
| Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer | ||||||||
| and Secretary | ||||||||
Exhibit 99.1
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
WESTERN DIGITAL PROVIDES FURTHER DETAIL ON THE LEGAL PROCESS
RELATED TO TOSHIBA
Comments on Toshiba’s Decision to Move Forward with SK Hynix-led Consortium
SAN JOSE, Calif. – September 26, 2017 – Western Digital Corp. (NASDAQ: WDC) today provided further detail on the legal process related to the three NAND flash-memory joint ventures (“the Flash JVs”) operated with Toshiba Corporation (“Toshiba”).
John Hueston, counsel for Western Digital and partner of Hueston Hennigan LLP, stated, “Western Digital’s SanDisk subsidiary has been a good partner to Toshiba, has honored its commitments and obligations to the joint ventures, and has been steadfast in its efforts to reach a mutually agreeable resolution. Toshiba has resorted to retaliatory actions against its JV partner to try to coerce SanDisk to surrender its consent rights, including its lockout of Western Digital employees in June and its attempt to exclude SanDisk from certain capacity investments – neither of which has any legal basis. Absent any willingness on Toshiba’s part to resolve this matter with its JV partner in a constructive manner, we intend to continue our successful legal efforts into the binding arbitration process.”
Independent, Objective Proceedings in the ICC International Court of Arbitration
Western Digital’s SanDisk subsidiaries (“SanDisk”) have commenced three arbitrations in the ICC International Court of Arbitration:
| • | May 14, 2017: SanDisk filed a request for arbitration in response to Toshiba’s purported transfer of its Flash JV interests to Toshiba Memory Corporation (“TMC”) for the purpose of transferring them to a third party without obtaining SanDisk’s consent in breach of the Flash JV agreements. The arbitration demand seeks, among other things, an order requiring Toshiba to undo the transfer to TMC, and injunctive relief preventing Toshiba from further breaching the Flash JV agreements by transferring its JV interests without SanDisk’s consent. |
| • | July 5, 2017: SanDisk filed a request for arbitration in response to Toshiba’s coercive and retaliatory action in blocking employees of SanDisk’s affiliates – including employees of Western Digital – from |
Western Digital Provides Further Detail on the Legal Process Related to Toshiba
Page | 2
| continuing to access Toshiba’s databases and networks that both partners use in furtherance of their Flash JV activities. The arbitration demand seeks, among other things, a permanent injunction prohibiting Toshiba from preventing certain Western Digital personnel from accessing shared databases or networks for the Flash JVs that are reasonably required to fulfill their respective duties. |
| • | September 20, 2017: SanDisk filed a request for arbitration in response to Toshiba’s improper attempt to invest unilaterally in manufacturing equipment for the Flash JV operations in Yokkaichi, Japan, including the new fab currently under construction, Fab 6. The arbitration demand seeks, among other things, a permanent injunction preventing Toshiba from making unilateral investments in manufacturing equipment for the fabs without first giving SanDisk the opportunity to make a comparable investment in expansions and conversions of JV capacity for BiCS 3D NAND flash memory. |
The arbitration proceedings will be held in San Francisco, California, per the terms of the Flash JV agreements.
Each arbitration matter will be decided by an arbitral tribunal of three impartial arbitrators.
In the first two arbitrations (commenced May 14 and July 5), the ICC International Court of Arbitration has already confirmed the appointment of SanDisk’s and Toshiba’s party-nominated arbitrators, and the third arbitrator, who will serve as the chair of the arbitral tribunal, is expected to be confirmed shortly. The parties have agreed that the first two arbitrations will be decided by the same arbitral tribunal.
In the third arbitration (commenced September 20), SanDisk has nominated the same arbitrator as it did in the first two arbitrations, and will ask Toshiba to agree that the same arbitral tribunal will decide all three arbitrations.
Shortly after the arbitral tribunal is confirmed, it will set a schedule for the arbitrations. SanDisk plans to seek interim injunctive relief, and a decision on SanDisk’s request can be expected as soon as early 2018. Following that, there will be a period where the parties submit memorials to the arbitral tribunal, and a final ruling may not come until 2019 given that complex international arbitrations like these often take more than 24 months.
Western Digital Provides Further Detail on the Legal Process Related to Toshiba
Page | 3
Importantly, an award by the arbitral tribunal, including an award of interim injunctive relief, may be confirmed by a court and once confirmed, any violation of that award could result in a finding of contempt of court and additional enforcement proceedings.
Mr. Hueston continued, “Joint ventures are inherently intimate commercial relationships, and in order to protect against being forced into such a relationship with parties not of their choosing, SanDisk and Toshiba agreed to protect their interests in the joint ventures by prohibiting transfers without the consent of the other partner. We enter the arbitration process with strong momentum, having already won multiple court rulings in our favor on these very matters. Western Digital remains confident that SanDisk will succeed on the merits of its claims.”
Toshiba’s Chosen Path Is a Clear Violation of the Flash JV Agreements
On September 20, 2017, Toshiba announced its intention to transfer its interests in the Flash JVs to a consortium led by Korea-based SK Hynix Inc. and Bain Capital.
Western Digital commented:
We are disappointed that Toshiba would take this action despite Western Digital’s tireless efforts to reach a resolution that is in the best interests of all stakeholders. Throughout the course of the negotiations, we made numerous concessions to attempt to meet Toshiba’s needs. Most notably, we offered to withdraw our participation in the Innovation Network Corporation of Japan (“INCJ”) and KKR & Co. L.P. (“KKR”) consortium, thus minimizing regulatory risk, and eliminate our option to participate in TMC equity ownership going forward, thus directly addressing a key concern of TMC’s management team.
Furthermore, in the event Toshiba selected the INCJ/KKR consortium, SanDisk was prepared to provide its consent and agree to the immediate, mutual withdrawal of all litigation with Toshiba. These significant concessions – made in the spirit of a 17-year partnership – would have not only provided significant deal certainty and an expedient closing, but also would have fully addressed Toshiba’s needs.
Western Digital Provides Further Detail on the Legal Process Related to Toshiba
Page | 4
It is concerning, therefore, that Toshiba would choose to partner with a consortium that includes both competitors and customers, giving rise to the potential to not only weaken the JVs going forward, but introducing regulatory risk that did not exist in the proposal offered by INCJ/KKR.
Moreover, we believe SK Hynix’s participation in the chosen consortium heightens the risk of technology leakage from the JVs and Japan. In addition to being a competitor to both Toshiba and Western Digital, SK Hynix was recently at the center of a well-publicized theft of Toshiba and SanDisk’s trade secrets. Just two years ago, SK Hynix made substantial monetary and business concessions to Toshiba and SanDisk to settle claims brought by both companies that SK Hynix misappropriated critical JV technology.
There has never been a more critical time for Toshiba to pursue the right course of action – a course that promises clarity and certainty. And yet, Toshiba has chosen to pursue a path that jeopardizes our 17-year partnership and cumulative joint investments in the Flash JVs, not to mention substantially increases risk for Toshiba stakeholders and the company itself.
Multiple Court Rulings Have Been Made in SanDisk’s Favor
| • | July 11, 2017: The Superior Court of California for the County of San Francisco (“Superior Court of California”) granted SanDisk’s request for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) prohibiting Toshiba from preventing certain employees from accessing shared databases and networks regarding the three NAND flash-memory JVs operated with SanDisk and from refusing to ship certain engineering wafers and samples. Toshiba appealed and asked the California Court of Appeal First Appellate District (“Court of Appeal”) to stay the TRO pending the appeal, which the Court of Appeal temporarily granted while it considered Toshiba’s petition for a lengthier stay. However, after having the opportunity to review SanDisk’s legal brief, which the Court of Appeal did not have when it issued the temporary stay, the Court of Appeal summarily dissolved its temporary stay, thereby reinstating the TRO. |
| • | July 28, 2017: The Superior Court of California entered a stipulated order preventing Toshiba from closing any transfer of its Flash JV interests without providing at least 14 days advance notice to SanDisk. As part of the agreement, Toshiba accepted the Superior Court of California’s jurisdiction over Toshiba for purposes of enforcing this order. |
Western Digital Provides Further Detail on the Legal Process Related to Toshiba
Page | 5
| • | August 14, 2017: The Superior Court of California granted SanDisk a preliminary injunction enjoining Toshiba from preventing certain employees from accessing shared databases and networks regarding the three NAND flash-memory JVs operated with SanDisk and from refusing to ship certain engineering wafers and samples. |
| • | September 8, 2017: As the Superior Court of California concluded that it can exercise jurisdiction over Toshiba and TMC, the Superior Court of California entered a final order denying Toshiba’s “motion to quash.” |
About Western Digital
Western Digital is an industry-leading provider of storage technologies and solutions that enable people to create, leverage, experience and preserve data. The company addresses ever-changing market needs by providing a full portfolio of compelling, high-quality storage solutions with customer-focused innovation, high efficiency, flexibility and speed. Our products are marketed under the HGST, SanDisk and WD brands to OEMs, distributors, resellers, cloud infrastructure providers and consumers. Financial and investor information is available on the company’s Investor Relations website at investor.wdc.com.
Forward-Looking Statements
This news release contains certain forward-looking statements, including statements concerning the Flash JVs, SanDisk’s rights under the Flash JV agreements and its actions to protect such rights, ongoing proceedings with respect to those rights and potential outcomes with respect to those proceedings, Toshiba’s recently announced transaction with a consortium led by SK Hynix Inc. and Bain Capital, and Western Digital’s or SanDisk’s actions in response to Toshiba’s announced transaction. There are a number of risks and uncertainties that may cause these forward-looking statements to be inaccurate including, among others: uncertainties with respect to the company’s business ventures with Toshiba; volatility in global economic conditions; business conditions and growth in the storage ecosystem; impact of competitive products and pricing; market acceptance and cost of commodity materials and specialized product components; actions by competitors; unexpected advances in competing technologies; our
Western Digital Provides Further Detail on the Legal Process Related to Toshiba
Page | 6
development and introduction of products based on new technologies and expansion into new data storage markets; risks associated with acquisitions, mergers and joint ventures; difficulties or delays in manufacturing; and other risks and uncertainties listed in the company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), including the company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on Aug. 29, 2017, to which your attention is directed. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof, and the company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.
###
Western Digital, WD and SanDisk are registered trademarks or trademarks of Western Digital Corporation or its affiliates in the U.S. and/or other countries. Other trademarks, registered trademarks, and/or service marks, indicated or otherwise, are the property of their respective owners. © 2017 Western Digital Corporation or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Contacts
United States
Media Contact:
Jim Pascoe, 408-717-6999
jim.pascoe@wdc.com
or
Investor Contact:
Bob Blair, 949-672-7834
robert.blair@wdc.com
or
Joele Frank, Wilkinson Brimmer Katcher
Eric Brielmann / Jed Repko / Ed Trissel
415-869-3950 / 212-355-4449
wdcmedia@joelefrank.com
Japan
Media Contacts:
Emi Hatano, 090-5765-9730
emi.hatano@sandisk.com
or
Ashton Consulting
John Sunley / Brendan Jennings
03 5425-7220 / 090—7416-0180 / 050 7576-6190
WDC_JapanPR@ashton.jp